Bogleech
sixthrock:

I’m exaggerating, of course, but not by much.
Guys, not every single Pokemon has to be sleek and pretty and attractive because not every animal in real life is sleek and pretty and attractive. For every majestic wolf running triumphantly across the plains there’s a billion faceless, eyeless, lowly parasites crawling through its digestive tract. For every cute, playful, lovable dolphin there are countless deep sea weirdos with bulging eyeballs, mouse-traps for jaws and teeth so long they have to have special indentations in their skulls specifically so they won’t impale their brains every time they close their mouth.
Why shouldn’t a fictional ecosystem follow suit? Sentient garbage piles, demon balloons and friendly ice cream cones fit Pokemon’s whimsical dream world logic just as much, if not moreso, than all the magical fairy wolves and mighty god-dragons in the world, yet people still insist that every single creature in their universe must be cute/cool/badass to count as a “real” Pokemon, whatever the hell that means. Again, this picture is an exaggeration, but I’ve honestly seen people arguing that, say, Mandibuzz is a “stupid” design and would look better without the bone headdress and eyelashes and basically everything that makes it a Mandibuzz and not just a regular vulture.
And where’s the fun in that? To me, it’s the loopy, whimsical, cartoonish designs that really scream “POKEMON!”. Not the five million Eevee recolors or the obligatory cute, marketable electric rodent they introduce every single generation, but the bug eyed, comical, silly goofballs that show the most sense of creativity and humor, yet endlessly get trashed by “old school” fans who want everything to be clean and sleek and serious all the time.
KEEP POKEMON UGLY!

I can’t add anything because this is a rant and visual example I’d have done no differently <3

sixthrock:

I’m exaggerating, of course, but not by much.

Guys, not every single Pokemon has to be sleek and pretty and attractive because not every animal in real life is sleek and pretty and attractive. For every majestic wolf running triumphantly across the plains there’s a billion faceless, eyeless, lowly parasites crawling through its digestive tract. For every cute, playful, lovable dolphin there are countless deep sea weirdos with bulging eyeballs, mouse-traps for jaws and teeth so long they have to have special indentations in their skulls specifically so they won’t impale their brains every time they close their mouth.

Why shouldn’t a fictional ecosystem follow suit? Sentient garbage piles, demon balloons and friendly ice cream cones fit Pokemon’s whimsical dream world logic just as much, if not moreso, than all the magical fairy wolves and mighty god-dragons in the world, yet people still insist that every single creature in their universe must be cute/cool/badass to count as a “real” Pokemon, whatever the hell that means. Again, this picture is an exaggeration, but I’ve honestly seen people arguing that, say, Mandibuzz is a “stupid” design and would look better without the bone headdress and eyelashes and basically everything that makes it a Mandibuzz and not just a regular vulture.

And where’s the fun in that? To me, it’s the loopy, whimsical, cartoonish designs that really scream “POKEMON!”. Not the five million Eevee recolors or the obligatory cute, marketable electric rodent they introduce every single generation, but the bug eyed, comical, silly goofballs that show the most sense of creativity and humor, yet endlessly get trashed by “old school” fans who want everything to be clean and sleek and serious all the time.

KEEP POKEMON UGLY!

I can’t add anything because this is a rant and visual example I’d have done no differently <3

  1. sharkymalarky reblogged this from sixthrock
  2. sassytheskydragon reblogged this from bogleech
  3. ockitten reblogged this from golbatt
  4. sixthrock reblogged this from nukenai and added:
    Heh I’m not insulting the Eeveelutions/cute rodents, just the people who think EVERY Pokemon has to be an...
  5. wafflemunster reblogged this from nukenai
  6. thateffinpoco reblogged this from iph33r
  7. iph33r reblogged this from colorofsakura
  8. leanderp reblogged this from sazandodile
  9. pierre-kun reblogged this from nukenai
  10. nukenai reblogged this from goldeentail and added:
    While I agree with this rant I wish one of these could be made without insulting other pokemon. (eevee and the electric...
  11. goldeentail reblogged this from yoshi12370 and added:
    wait how are drifloon and oshawott ugly but the drifloon-dog omg
  12. fortheloveofbutterscotch reblogged this from colorofsakura
  13. boxxy4prez reblogged this from scarvesanddeerstalkers
  14. scarvesanddeerstalkers reblogged this from yoshi12370
  15. colorofsakura reblogged this from yoshi12370
  16. yoshi12370 reblogged this from sixthrock
  17. zoeykoko reblogged this from sixthrock and added:
    those pokedogs aren’t sparkly enough you start lacking originality when you want everything to be as perfect and...
  18. lairofthewanderinggodhead reblogged this from oak23
  19. oak23 reblogged this from squidmama
  20. furrydreamer reblogged this from eridangirlhomestuck and added:
    what are you talking about? in my eyes, at least three or four of these pokemon are uber kawaii!
  21. gamzeescodpiece reblogged this from straightrazorcabaret and added:
    Dunsparce are adorable, albeit forgettable.
  22. eridangirlhomestuck reblogged this from straightrazorcabaret
  23. straightrazorcabaret reblogged this from squidmama
  24. squidmama reblogged this from sazandodile and added:
    dunsparce are fucking kawaii
  25. sazandodile reblogged this from sixthrock and added:
    I wouldn’t say “keep pokemon ugly”,...subjective, but… “keep pokemon diversified”? “keep...
Blog comments powered by Disqus